On 25/4/21 11:41 am, Zane van Iperen wrote:
Interesting, FATE didn't catch it for me. Which test is it?
$ make fate-adpcm fate-acodec fate-westwood-aud SAMPLES=fate-suite/
All pass for me.
Never mind, found it.
Both the sample from the ticket as well as the fate-sample
(vqa/cc-demo1-pa
On 25/4/21 11:02 am, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Zane van Iperen:
On 25/4/21 9:40 am, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
This format is covered by FATE (namely the adpcm-ima-ws test) and so you
need to update the checksums in your patch; of course you should verify
that your change is correct. See h
Zane van Iperen:
>
>
> On 25/4/21 9:40 am, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>
>> This format is covered by FATE (namely the adpcm-ima-ws test) and so you
>> need to update the checksums in your patch; of course you should verify
>> that your change is correct. See https://ffmpeg.org/fate.html for more.
On 25/4/21 9:40 am, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
This format is covered by FATE (namely the adpcm-ima-ws test) and so you
need to update the checksums in your patch; of course you should verify
that your change is correct. See https://ffmpeg.org/fate.html for more.
- Andreas
___
Aidan Richmond:
> Fixes bug #9198
>
> Signed-off-by: Aidan Richmond
> ---
> libavcodec/adpcm.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/adpcm.c b/libavcodec/adpcm.c
> index be14607eac..5ec9691001 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/adpcm.c
> +++ b/libavcod
Fixes bug #9198
Signed-off-by: Aidan Richmond
---
libavcodec/adpcm.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/adpcm.c b/libavcodec/adpcm.c
index be14607eac..5ec9691001 100644
--- a/libavcodec/adpcm.c
+++ b/libavcodec/adpcm.c
@@ -1400,16 +1400,16 @@ sta
