On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 06:49:51PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 12:40:07PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> [...]
>
> > its much more text to type too.
>
> shorter options:
>
> AV_OPT_FLAG_ALTERABLE_PARAM
>
> AV_OPT_FLAG_MUTABLE_PARAM
>
> (just in case consensus ends
On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 12:40:07PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
[...]
> its much more text to type too.
shorter options:
AV_OPT_FLAG_ALTERABLE_PARAM
AV_OPT_FLAG_MUTABLE_PARAM
(just in case consensus ends on a rename, i am not sure a rename is a good idea
here)
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG
On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 11:37:19AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Tuesday 2024-07-02 10:08:37 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
[...]
> While I agree with Anton that we should avoid duplication, for the
> usual arguments that a reference should avoid duplication of content
> as much as possible
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 11:44 AM Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Tuesday 2024-07-02 10:08:37 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> > Some notes about this version:
> >
> > As previously mentioned, I think this is better with all three patches,
> > but can live without #2.
> >
> > I think I've followed t
On date Tuesday 2024-07-02 10:08:37 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> Some notes about this version:
>
> As previously mentioned, I think this is better with all three patches,
> but can live without #2.
>
> I think I've followed the deprecation instructions, but editing APIchanges
> seems to imply
Some notes about this version:
As previously mentioned, I think this is better with all three patches,
but can live without #2.
I think I've followed the deprecation instructions, but editing APIchanges
seems to imply needing a minor version bump? This patch includes said bump.
Zhao Zhili arg