Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v3] Require compilers to support C11.

2024-02-12 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:52:14AM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 2/12/2024 8:04 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Any more comments on this? > > > > Anyone opposed to this going to master this week? > > Michael said his machines needed updating gcc for c17. Wait to see if that > still applies to c11.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v3] Require compilers to support C11.

2024-02-12 Thread James Almer
On 2/12/2024 8:04 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: Any more comments on this? Anyone opposed to this going to master this week? Michael said his machines needed updating gcc for c17. Wait to see if that still applies to c11. ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list f

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v3] Require compilers to support C11.

2024-02-12 Thread Anton Khirnov
Any more comments on this? Anyone opposed to this going to master this week? -- Anton Khirnov ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-deve

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v3] Require compilers to support C11.

2024-02-09 Thread Anton Khirnov
It should be available in all relevant modern compilers and will allow us to use features like anonymous unions. Note that stdatomic.h is still emulated on MSVC, as current versions require the /experimental:c11atomics, and do not support ATOMIC_VAR_INIT() anyway. --- The general consensus seems t