Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] [RFC] Exif Overhaul

2024-10-01 Thread Anton Khirnov
Quoting Leo Izen (2024-10-01 18:36:37) > EXIF is basically an IFD, or a tiff directory, that contains a list of > tags. Each tag has a type, which may also be IFD. > > How would you recommend I go about doing this in a way that works with > frame side data, which as far as I understand has to be

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] [RFC] Exif Overhaul

2024-10-01 Thread Leo Izen
On 10/1/24 7:36 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: Quoting James Almer (2024-09-30 01:01:39) On 9/16/2024 11:43 AM, Leo Izen wrote: I've made some changes to the last EXIF overhaul patch I sent, notably I fixed up some bugs and added MakerNote parsing, so it should not corrupt MakerNotes that are inside

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] [RFC] Exif Overhaul

2024-10-01 Thread Anton Khirnov
Quoting James Almer (2024-09-30 01:01:39) > On 9/16/2024 11:43 AM, Leo Izen wrote: > > I've made some changes to the last EXIF overhaul patch I sent, > > notably I fixed up some bugs and added MakerNote parsing, so it > > should not corrupt MakerNotes that are inside TIFF files. > > > > MakerNote

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] [RFC] Exif Overhaul

2024-09-29 Thread James Almer
On 9/16/2024 11:43 AM, Leo Izen wrote: I've made some changes to the last EXIF overhaul patch I sent, notably I fixed up some bugs and added MakerNote parsing, so it should not corrupt MakerNotes that are inside TIFF files. MakerNote is supposed to be a binary blob but many camera manufacturers

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] [RFC] Exif Overhaul

2024-09-16 Thread Leo Izen
I've made some changes to the last EXIF overhaul patch I sent, notably I fixed up some bugs and added MakerNote parsing, so it should not corrupt MakerNotes that are inside TIFF files. MakerNote is supposed to be a binary blob but many camera manufacturers treat it as an IFD (e.g. Canon) with offs