Hi Timo,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 5:49 PM compn wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 14:56:23 +0100, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
>
> > On 11/12/2024 10:10, Arnaud Masserann wrote:
> > > Hi, any feedback on this patch ?
> >
> > I do not appear to have received the mail you are replying to here
>
>
> https://
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 14:56:23 +0100, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> On 11/12/2024 10:10, Arnaud Masserann wrote:
> > Hi, any feedback on this patch ?
>
> I do not appear to have received the mail you are replying to here
https://ffmpeg.org//pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2024-December/336971.html
On 11/12/2024 10:10, Arnaud Masserann wrote:
Hi, any feedback on this patch ?
I do not appear to have received the mail you are replying to here
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To
Hi, any feedback on this patch ?
Thanks
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Most demuxers allocate a new buffer for each packet.
For MOV, this can be problematic, because of some high-bitrate
codecs like ProRes/HAPQ/NotchLC.
Use pools of buffer instead.
For some test media, demuxing goes from 20ms/frame to 11ms/frame,
close to the perf of ReadFile (10ms/frame), making it