Am 03.07.19 um 10:52 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
>
>> I too thought on that, but the existing functions too rely on
>> float/double. Should I anyway provide a solution with integer arithmetic?
> its indepedant of your patch but i think all these should use integers
> unless its too messy
Now see
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:28:53AM +0200, Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Thanks Michael for your review, answers inline ...
>
> Am 01.07.19 um 17:16 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
> >> timestamp.h | 78
> >>
> >> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+),
Am 02.07.19 um 00:28 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
>> If this could be done without float/double that would be preferred as it
>> avoids inaccuracies / slight differences between platforms
> I too thought on that, but the existing functions too rely on
> float/double. Should I anyway provide a solution with
Thanks Michael for your review, answers inline ...
Am 01.07.19 um 17:16 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
>> timestamp.h | 78
>>
>> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 3d1275421b1b8d4952815151158c7af954d38ca6 timestamp_2
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 11:51:30AM +0200, Ulf Zibis wrote:
>
> Am 29.06.19 um 18:12 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
> > Hi,
> >
> > for my developement of another filter I need additional timestamp print
> > formats.
> >
> > So I like to share my efforts. Are you interested to include them to the
> > project?
Am 29.06.19 um 18:12 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
> Hi,
>
> for my developement of another filter I need additional timestamp print
> formats.
>
> So I like to share my efforts. Are you interested to include them to the
> project?
>
> For libavutil/timestamp.h I'm also wondering, why these format functions
