On 8/22/2021 11:37 AM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 8/22/2021 10:25 AM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
The low overhead OBU format provides no means to resync after performing
a byte-based seek; in other words: Byte based seeking is just not
supported.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt
James Almer:
> On 8/22/2021 10:25 AM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> The low overhead OBU format provides no means to resync after performing
>> a byte-based seek; in other words: Byte based seeking is just not
>> supported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt
>> ---
>> The reason I didn't disal
On 8/22/2021 10:25 AM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
The low overhead OBU format provides no means to resync after performing
a byte-based seek; in other words: Byte based seeking is just not
supported.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt
---
The reason I didn't disallow this earlier was that there i
The low overhead OBU format provides no means to resync after performing
a byte-based seek; in other words: Byte based seeking is just not
supported.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt
---
The reason I didn't disallow this earlier was that there is one scenario
where such a seek would work: When o
