On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le decadi 10 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Hendrik Leppkes a écrit :
>> We generally just use ints for boolean properties, any particular
>> reason this uses unsigned instead?
>
> Just a matter of personal habit, justified below. But as I look at it,
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:26:23PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le decadi 10 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Hendrik Leppkes a écrit :
> > We generally just use ints for boolean properties, any particular
> > reason this uses unsigned instead?
>
> Just a matter of personal habit, justified below. But as I
Le decadi 10 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Hendrik Leppkes a écrit :
> We generally just use ints for boolean properties, any particular
> reason this uses unsigned instead?
Just a matter of personal habit, justified below. But as I look at it, I see
it is rather inconsistent with other fields in the struc
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Instead of calling the input filter request_frame() method,
> ff_request_frame() now marks the link and returns immediately.
> bufferskin is changed to activate the marked filters until
> a frame is obtained.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Georg
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 05:21:52PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Instead of calling the input filter request_frame() method,
> ff_request_frame() now marks the link and returns immediately.
> bufferskin is changed to activate the marked filters until
sink
didnt review the rest (migh
Instead of calling the input filter request_frame() method,
ff_request_frame() now marks the link and returns immediately.
bufferskin is changed to activate the marked filters until
a frame is obtained.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas George
---
libavfilter/avfilter.c | 20 +++-
libavfil