On 11/13/2019 12:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>
>> Am 12.11.2019 um 04:01 schrieb James Almer :
>>
>>> On 11/11/2019 2:36 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>>
>>>
Am 11.11.2019 um 22:36 schrieb James Almer :
+AVInputFormat ff_obu_demuxer = {
+.name = "obu",
>>>
>>
> Am 12.11.2019 um 04:01 schrieb James Almer :
>
>> On 11/11/2019 2:36 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 11.11.2019 um 22:36 schrieb James Almer :
>>>
>>> +AVInputFormat ff_obu_demuxer = {
>>> +.name = "obu",
>>
>> Why is the demuxer not called “av1”?
>>
>> Thank you, C
On 11/11/2019 4:28 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> James Almer:
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>> ---
>> configure| 1 +
>> libavformat/Makefile | 1 +
>> libavformat/allformats.c | 1 +
>> libavformat/obu.c| 276 +++
>> 4 files
James Almer:
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> configure| 1 +
> libavformat/Makefile | 1 +
> libavformat/allformats.c | 1 +
> libavformat/obu.c| 276 +++
> 4 files changed, 279 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 libavfor
On 11/11/2019 2:36 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>
>> Am 11.11.2019 um 22:36 schrieb James Almer :
>>
>> +AVInputFormat ff_obu_demuxer = {
>> +.name = "obu",
>
> Why is the demuxer not called “av1”?
>
> Thank you, Carl Eugen
> (Sleepless in Japan)
I liked obu more, being the exte
> Am 11.11.2019 um 22:36 schrieb James Almer :
>
> +AVInputFormat ff_obu_demuxer = {
> +.name = "obu",
Why is the demuxer not called “av1”?
Thank you, Carl Eugen
(Sleepless in Japan)
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
configure| 1 +
libavformat/Makefile | 1 +
libavformat/allformats.c | 1 +
libavformat/obu.c| 276 +++
4 files changed, 279 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 libavformat/obu.c
diff --git a/confi
