On 4/6/2017 1:01 PM, James Darnley wrote:
> On 2017-04-05 06:05, James Almer wrote:
>> On 4/4/2017 10:53 PM, James Darnley wrote:
>>> Haswell:
>>> - 1.02x faster (405±0.7 vs. 397±0.8 decicycles) compared with mmxext
>>>
>>> Skylake-U:
>>> - 1.06x faster (498±1.8 vs. 470±1.3 decicycles) compared w
On 2017-04-05 06:05, James Almer wrote:
> On 4/4/2017 10:53 PM, James Darnley wrote:
>> Haswell:
>> - 1.02x faster (405±0.7 vs. 397±0.8 decicycles) compared with mmxext
>>
>> Skylake-U:
>> - 1.06x faster (498±1.8 vs. 470±1.3 decicycles) compared with mmxext
>> ---
>> libavcodec/x86/h264_idct.asm
On 4/4/2017 10:53 PM, James Darnley wrote:
> Haswell:
> - 1.02x faster (405±0.7 vs. 397±0.8 decicycles) compared with mmxext
>
> Skylake-U:
> - 1.06x faster (498±1.8 vs. 470±1.3 decicycles) compared with mmxext
> ---
> libavcodec/x86/h264_idct.asm | 20
> libavcodec/x86/h2
Haswell:
- 1.02x faster (405±0.7 vs. 397±0.8 decicycles) compared with mmxext
Skylake-U:
- 1.06x faster (498±1.8 vs. 470±1.3 decicycles) compared with mmxext
---
libavcodec/x86/h264_idct.asm | 20
libavcodec/x86/h264dsp_init.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
di