On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:02:29PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 02:41:59PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Oct 24, 201
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 02:41:59PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:29:23AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> ISO C restricts enumerator values to the range of int. Thus (for instance)
> >> 0x80
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 02:41:59PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:29:23AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> >> ISO C restricts enumer
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 02:41:59PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:29:23AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> ISO C restricts enumerator values to the range of int. Thus (for instance)
> >> 0x80
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le tridi 3 brumaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit :
>> or do you prefer a static const style?
>
> static const is not build-time constant, and therefore unusable for this:
> impossible to use it as case label or constant initializer
Le tridi 3 brumaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit :
> or do you prefer a static const style?
static const is not build-time constant, and therefore unusable for this:
impossible to use it as case label or constant initializer.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: D
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:29:23AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> ISO C restricts enumerator values to the range of int. Thus (for instance)
>> 0x8000
>> unfortunately does not work, and throws a warning with -Wpedantic on
>>
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:29:23AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> ISO C restricts enumerator values to the range of int. Thus (for instance)
> 0x8000
> unfortunately does not work, and throws a warning with -Wpedantic on
> clang 3.7.
>
> This fixes such errors by explicitly casting as an
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:08 AM, wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:29:23 -0400
> Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
>> ISO C restricts enumerator values to the range of int. Thus (for instance)
>> 0x8000
>> unfortunately does not work, and throws a warning with -Wpedantic on
>> clang 3.7.
>>
>>
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:29:23 -0400
Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> ISO C restricts enumerator values to the range of int. Thus (for instance)
> 0x8000
> unfortunately does not work, and throws a warning with -Wpedantic on
> clang 3.7.
>
> This fixes such errors by explicitly casting as an int,
ISO C restricts enumerator values to the range of int. Thus (for instance)
0x8000
unfortunately does not work, and throws a warning with -Wpedantic on
clang 3.7.
This fixes such errors by explicitly casting as an int, doing the
desired unsigned to signed conversion. This method works on all c
11 matches
Mail list logo
