applied
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Burt P wrote:
> * use the actual sample rate
> * use a more sensible frequency for the tone
> * update fate test result
>
> Signed-off-by: Burt P
> ---
> libavfilter/af_hdcd.c | 9 ++---
> tests/fate/filter-audio.mak | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 7
2016-09-06 14:01 GMT+02:00 Burt P. :
> In this patch, I took the opportunity to remove a hard-coded rate and
> use one from the framework.
Thanks for explaining!
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-06 13:02 GMT+02:00 Burt P. :
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> 2016-09-05 13:18 GMT+02:00 Burt P :
* use the actual sample rate
>>>
>>> Is hdcd supposed to work for sample_rates
>>> different from
2016-09-06 13:02 GMT+02:00 Burt P. :
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2016-09-05 13:18 GMT+02:00 Burt P :
>>> * use the actual sample rate
>>
>> Is hdcd supposed to work for sample_rates
>> different from 44100?
>
> As I understand it, yes. The PM Model 2 supported code
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-05 13:18 GMT+02:00 Burt P :
>> * use the actual sample rate
>
> Is hdcd supposed to work for sample_rates
> different from 44100?
As I understand it, yes. The PM Model 2 supported code insertion at
all CD and DVD-Audio sample rates
2016-09-05 13:18 GMT+02:00 Burt P :
> * use the actual sample rate
Is hdcd supposed to work for sample_rates
different from 44100?
> * use a more sensible frequency for the tone
> * update fate test result
Can't this be split?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-de
* use the actual sample rate
* use a more sensible frequency for the tone
* update fate test result
Signed-off-by: Burt P
---
libavfilter/af_hdcd.c | 9 ++---
tests/fate/filter-audio.mak | 2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavfilter/af_hdcd.c b/liba
