On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 09:11:10AM -0700, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:50:52PM -0700, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> 1. The most important change is the addition of a permute call to ensure
> >> that the co
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:50:52PM -0700, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> 1. The most important change is the addition of a permute call to ensure
>> that the comparison between fftw and avfft is fair, since fftw does not
>> require the ca
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 03:53:29PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:50:52PM -0700, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> > 1. The most important change is the addition of a permute call to ensure
> > that the comparison between fftw and avfft is fair, since fftw does not
> > req
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:50:52PM -0700, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> 1. The most important change is the addition of a permute call to ensure
> that the comparison between fftw and avfft is fair, since fftw does not
> require the call. This is evident from the test code additions in the
> previous
1. The most important change is the addition of a permute call to ensure
that the comparison between fftw and avfft is fair, since fftw does not
require the call. This is evident from the test code additions in the
previous commit, and also from http://www.fftw.org/benchfft/.
2. Added in a memcpy f