On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:56:42AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Completely random comment, but isn't it easier to just enable the safe
> > bitstream reader?
> >
>
> This is actually enabled by default, so it probably should never hav
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:32 PM, foo86 wrote:
>
>> Limit the maximum length of unary part of Rice code by the number of
>> available bits instead of using an arbitrary constant that happens to be
>> just large enough to work.
>>
>>
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:32 PM, foo86 wrote:
> Limit the maximum length of unary part of Rice code by the number of
> available bits instead of using an arbitrary constant that happens to be
> just large enough to work.
>
> This effectively limits amount of data that can be overread per segm
Limit the maximum length of unary part of Rice code by the number of
available bits instead of using an arbitrary constant that happens to be
just large enough to work.
This effectively limits amount of data that can be overread per segment
by maximum length of binary code per sample multiplied by
