Il 17/10/2018 21:48, Hendrik Leppkes ha scritto:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:45 PM Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 21:40:58 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
PS: do I need to remove your e-mail on TO field every time I reply to
you? It's not a problem, only to know.
This mailing lis
Il 17/10/2018 21:45, Moritz Barsnick ha scritto:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 21:40:58 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
PS: do I need to remove your e-mail on TO field every time I reply to
you? It's not a problem, only to know.
This mailing list uses a Reply-To: header, pointing at the list
address. Y
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:45 PM Moritz Barsnick wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 21:40:58 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> > PS: do I need to remove your e-mail on TO field every time I reply to
> > you? It's not a problem, only to know.
>
> This mailing list uses a Reply-To: header, pointing at t
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 21:40:58 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> PS: do I need to remove your e-mail on TO field every time I reply to
> you? It's not a problem, only to know.
This mailing list uses a Reply-To: header, pointing at the list
address. Your Thuderbird should honor that automatically (
Il 17/10/2018 21:23, Carl Eugen Hoyos ha scritto:
2018-10-17 21:20 GMT+02:00, Giulio Benetti :
Il 17/10/2018 18:51, Carl Eugen Hoyos ha scritto:
I just meant that it was a mistake that above patch was backported
although it neither fixes a security issue nor a regression.
Ok, I understand, so
2018-10-17 21:20 GMT+02:00, Giulio Benetti :
> Il 17/10/2018 18:51, Carl Eugen Hoyos ha scritto:
>> I just meant that it was a mistake that above patch was backported
>> although it neither fixes a security issue nor a regression.
>
> Ok, I understand, so please discard this patch.
I was under the
Il 17/10/2018 18:51, Carl Eugen Hoyos ha scritto:
I just meant that it was a mistake that above patch was backported
although it neither fixes a security issue nor a regression.
Ok, I understand, so please discard this patch.
On Buildroot we will use a not upstreamed patch then.
Please don't
2018-10-17 15:54 GMT+02:00, Giulio Benetti :
> Re-add everybody in Cc
>
> Il 17/10/2018 15:08, Carl Eugen Hoyos ha scritto:
>> 2018-10-17 14:02 GMT+02:00, Giulio Benetti
>> :
>>> Commit c50dc77ac708e98d02da7c422a6b9cbf9f565aa5 has a pitfall, it
>>> appends -ldrm to "Libs:" instead of "Libs.private:
Re-add everybody in Cc
Il 17/10/2018 15:08, Carl Eugen Hoyos ha scritto:
2018-10-17 14:02 GMT+02:00, Giulio Benetti :
Commit c50dc77ac708e98d02da7c422a6b9cbf9f565aa5 has a pitfall, it
appends -ldrm to "Libs:" instead of "Libs.private:" in avutil.pc.
Assuming this was not a regression before:
Commit c50dc77ac708e98d02da7c422a6b9cbf9f565aa5 has a pitfall, it appends
-ldrm to "Libs:" instead of "Libs.private:" in avutil.pc.
This leads to append -ldrm to link library list tail in shared build too
and this doesn't make sense.
So revert the commit above and add a patch to handle explicit pri
10 matches
Mail list logo
