On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:34:54PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 09.03.2015 03:59, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >is anything using a 0/n timebase ?
>
> I don't think so.
>
> >if not i would extend this to also disallow 0/n
>
> OK, new patch attached.
>
> Best regards,
> Andreas
>
> ff
On 09.03.2015 03:59, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
is anything using a 0/n timebase ?
I don't think so.
if not i would extend this to also disallow 0/n
OK, new patch attached.
Best regards,
Andreas
>From be6482e2ecf8ea109e9d18f578dc5a17085dde43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Cadhalpu
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:03:33AM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached patch fixes assertions in av_rescale_rnd.
>
> Best regards,
> Andreas
> ffmdec.c | 11 +++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 26bb6e42cc4cb5afc9ac83c27152edece8d62943
> 0003-ffmdec-make-sure-the-
Hi,
attached patch fixes assertions in av_rescale_rnd.
Best regards,
Andreas
>From 8f647fe16693509056483c4d1bc4a57895e9de10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Cadhalpun
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 23:12:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] ffmdec: make sure the time base is valid
A negative time base c
