ons 2022-09-28 klockan 13:06 +0200 skrev Andreas Rheinhardt:
> Tomas Härdin:
> > tis 2022-09-27 klockan 17:23 +0200 skrev Tomas Härdin:
> > > mån 2022-09-26 klockan 16:24 +0200 skrev Tomas Härdin:
> > > > mån 2022-09-26 klockan 14:25 +0200 skrev Andreas Rheinhardt:
> > > > > Anton Khirnov:
> > > >
Tomas Härdin:
> tis 2022-09-27 klockan 17:23 +0200 skrev Tomas Härdin:
>> mån 2022-09-26 klockan 16:24 +0200 skrev Tomas Härdin:
>>> mån 2022-09-26 klockan 14:25 +0200 skrev Andreas Rheinhardt:
Anton Khirnov:
> Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-14 14:51:07)
>> Anton Khirnov:
>>>
tis 2022-09-27 klockan 17:23 +0200 skrev Tomas Härdin:
> mån 2022-09-26 klockan 16:24 +0200 skrev Tomas Härdin:
> > mån 2022-09-26 klockan 14:25 +0200 skrev Andreas Rheinhardt:
> > > Anton Khirnov:
> > > > Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-14 14:51:07)
> > > > > Anton Khirnov:
> > > > > > Quoting
mån 2022-09-26 klockan 16:24 +0200 skrev Tomas Härdin:
> mån 2022-09-26 klockan 14:25 +0200 skrev Andreas Rheinhardt:
> > Anton Khirnov:
> > > Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-14 14:51:07)
> > > > Anton Khirnov:
> > > > > Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-12 16:12:16)
> > > > > > Anton really
mån 2022-09-26 klockan 14:25 +0200 skrev Andreas Rheinhardt:
> Anton Khirnov:
> > Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-14 14:51:07)
> > > Anton Khirnov:
> > > > Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-12 16:12:16)
> > > > > Anton really dislikes the av_fast_* naming and instead wants
> > > > > this to b
Andreas Rheinhardt:
> Anton Khirnov:
>> Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-14 14:51:07)
>>> Anton Khirnov:
Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-12 16:12:16)
> Anton really dislikes the av_fast_* naming and instead wants this to be
> called av_realloc_array_reuse(). I don't care either
Anton Khirnov:
> Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-14 14:51:07)
>> Anton Khirnov:
>>> Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-12 16:12:16)
Anton really dislikes the av_fast_* naming and instead wants this to be
called av_realloc_array_reuse(). I don't care either way. Any more
opinions
Quoting Tomas Härdin (2022-07-21 23:23:25)
> tis 2022-07-12 klockan 16:12 +0200 skrev Andreas Rheinhardt:
> >
> > Anton really dislikes the av_fast_* naming and instead wants this to
> > be
> > called av_realloc_array_reuse(). I don't care either way. Any more
> > opinions on this (or on the patch
tis 2022-07-12 klockan 16:12 +0200 skrev Andreas Rheinhardt:
>
> Anton really dislikes the av_fast_* naming and instead wants this to
> be
> called av_realloc_array_reuse(). I don't care either way. Any more
> opinions on this (or on the patch itself)?
That's going to cause some "impedance mismat
Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-14 14:51:07)
> Anton Khirnov:
> > Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-12 16:12:16)
> >> Anton really dislikes the av_fast_* naming and instead wants this to be
> >> called av_realloc_array_reuse(). I don't care either way. Any more
> >> opinions on this (or on th
Anton Khirnov:
> Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-12 16:12:16)
>> Anton really dislikes the av_fast_* naming and instead wants this to be
>> called av_realloc_array_reuse(). I don't care either way. Any more
>> opinions on this (or on the patch itself)?
>
> If people dislike _reuse(), I am open
Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-07-12 16:12:16)
> Anton really dislikes the av_fast_* naming and instead wants this to be
> called av_realloc_array_reuse(). I don't care either way. Any more
> opinions on this (or on the patch itself)?
If people dislike _reuse(), I am open to other reasonable sug
Andreas Rheinhardt:
> From: Andreas Rheinhardt
>
> This is an array-equivalent of av_fast_realloc(). Its advantages
> compared to using av_fast_realloc() for allocating arrays are as
> follows:
>
> a) It performs its own overflow checks for the multiplication that is
> implicit in array allocati
ons 2022-07-06 klockan 16:46 +0200 skrev Andreas Rheinhardt:
> Tomas Härdin:
> > tis 2022-07-05 klockan 22:26 +0200 skrev Andreas Rheinhardt:
> > > From: Andreas Rheinhardt
> > >
> > > This is an array-equivalent of av_fast_realloc(). Its advantages
> > > compared to using av_fast_realloc() for a
Tomas Härdin:
> tis 2022-07-05 klockan 22:26 +0200 skrev Andreas Rheinhardt:
>> From: Andreas Rheinhardt
>>
>> This is an array-equivalent of av_fast_realloc(). Its advantages
>> compared to using av_fast_realloc() for allocating arrays are as
>> follows:
>>
>> a) It performs its own overflow chec
tis 2022-07-05 klockan 22:26 +0200 skrev Andreas Rheinhardt:
> From: Andreas Rheinhardt
>
> This is an array-equivalent of av_fast_realloc(). Its advantages
> compared to using av_fast_realloc() for allocating arrays are as
> follows:
>
> a) It performs its own overflow checks for the multiplica
From: Andreas Rheinhardt
This is an array-equivalent of av_fast_realloc(). Its advantages
compared to using av_fast_realloc() for allocating arrays are as
follows:
a) It performs its own overflow checks for the multiplication that is
implicit in array allocations. (And it only needs to perform t
17 matches
Mail list logo
