Hello,
On 08/10/2015 01:18 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Frank Lömker wrote:
>
>> http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi/2015/04/06
>
> I think there's a pretty big misunderstanding here: you think we're just
> frivolously changing API to anno
Hi Frank,
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Frank Lömker wrote:
> http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi/2015/04/06
I think there's a pretty big misunderstanding here: you think we're just
frivolously changing API to annoy you. That's not the case. We're
changing/adding API to expose new fe
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 02:39:28 +0200
Frank Lömker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 08/09/2015 08:51 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Frank Lömker wrote:
> >> And that's even the easy part. A lot of people don't update there
> >> distribution every six months, often it's years
Hello,
On 08/09/2015 08:51 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Frank Lömker wrote:
>> And that's even the easy part. A lot of people don't update there
>> distribution every six months, often it's years old. If you try to
>> support all these distributions you end up with
Hello,
On 08/09/2015 08:30 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 08:28:28PM +0200, Frank Lömker wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 08/09/2015 06:57 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Does not LGTM.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'm with this. Andreas, the correct fix is to update applications,
>>> even if that
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Frank Lömker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> And that's even the easy part. A lot of people don't update there
> distribution every six months, often it's years old. If you try to
> support all these distributions you end up with lot's and lot's of
> #ifdefery. With FFmpeg and
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 08:28:28PM +0200, Frank Lömker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 08/09/2015 06:57 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> Does not LGTM.
> >
> > Yeah, I'm with this. Andreas, the correct fix is to update applications,
> > even if that means vendor-specific patches in Debian. These are
> > ex
Hello,
On 08/09/2015 06:57 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Does not LGTM.
>
> Yeah, I'm with this. Andreas, the correct fix is to update applications,
> even if that means vendor-specific patches in Debian. These are
> exceptionally trivial patches that you can generate using fairly trivial
> sed s
Hi,
On 09.08.2015 12:57, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Yeah, I'm with this. Andreas, the correct fix is to update applications,
> even if that means vendor-specific patches in Debian. These are
> exceptionally trivial patches that you can generate using fairly trivial
> sed scripting.
The problem is
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 6:41 AM, wm4 wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 04:14:39 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> > > Only the PixelFormat removal is not delayed, because it is a very
> generic name.
> > >
> > > Signed-off
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 04:14:39 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> > Only the PixelFormat removal is not delayed, because it is a very generic
> > name.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun
> > ---
> > libavutil/pixfmt.h |
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Only the PixelFormat removal is not delayed, because it is a very generic
> name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun
> ---
> libavutil/pixfmt.h | 4 +++-
> libavutil/version.h | 5 -
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+),
Only the PixelFormat removal is not delayed, because it is a very generic name.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun
---
libavutil/pixfmt.h | 4 +++-
libavutil/version.h | 5 -
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavutil/pixfmt.h b/libavutil/pixfmt.h
index 5cdbeb9..
13 matches
Mail list logo
