L'octidi 8 prairial, an CCXXIV, Nicolas George a écrit :
> It seems the memory management is not as negligible as I expected. The
> result is a ~2.3% slow-down for ~90k frames from AVI, which is approximately
> equal to the standard deviation on 10 runs. I suspect this is acceptable
> compared to t
Le primidi 1er prairial, an CCXXIV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> can you do a quick time ffmpeg ... with -codec copy just to double
> check ? theres no major effect
It seems the memory management is not as negligible as I expected. The
result is a ~2.3% slow-down for ~90k frames from AVI, which
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:54:39PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 1er prairial, an CCXXIV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> > is the overhead from the null filter insiginicant ?
>
> I have not actually made a benchmark, but I believe it is. Look in
> libavcodec/bsf.c: the overhead is lim
Le primidi 1er prairial, an CCXXIV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> is the overhead from the null filter insiginicant ?
I have not actually made a benchmark, but I believe it is. Look in
libavcodec/bsf.c: the overhead is limited to a few checks and a
av_packet_move_ref().
Regards,
--
Nicolas
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 09:47:11AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas George
> ---
> libavformat/concatdec.c | 165
> ++--
> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>
>
> Unchanged.
>
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/concat
Signed-off-by: Nicolas George
---
libavformat/concatdec.c | 165 ++--
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
Unchanged.
diff --git a/libavformat/concatdec.c b/libavformat/concatdec.c
index b3a430e..bbea158 100644
--- a/libavformat/concatd
