On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> BTW, it would also help me if you or an AAC maintainer can come up
>> with a number below which dynamic initialization can always be done.
>
>
> I think the answer
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> BTW, it would also help me if you or an AAC maintainer can come up
> with a number below which dynamic initialization can always be done.
I think the answer is "never", since 0 is always faster than any number.
But that's not an
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch does not seem to have measurable impact, at least on x86-64,
>>> though
>>> there c
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> This patch does not seem to have measurable impact, at least on x86-64,
>> though
>> there could be benefits for less than stellar branch predictors.
>
> [..]
>>
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> This patch does not seem to have measurable impact, at least on x86-64,
>> though
>> there could be benefits for less than stellar branch predictors.
>
> [..]
>>
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> This patch does not seem to have measurable impact, at least on x86-64,
> though
> there could be benefits for less than stellar branch predictors.
>
[..]
> -for (i = 0; i < 1<<13; i++) {
> -if (!(i & 7))
> -
This patch does not seem to have measurable impact, at least on x86-64, though
there could be benefits for less than stellar branch predictors.
As such, the least useful of the series.
Tested with FATE.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
---
libavcodec/cbrt_tablegen.h | 14 +-
1 fil
