On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 04:59:25PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > From: Alex Smith
> >
> > There's no reason for it. ASLR will rebase it regardless so "preventing
> > collisions" isn't really relevant. This also brings it in line with
> >
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> From: Alex Smith
>
> There's no reason for it. ASLR will rebase it regardless so "preventing
> collisions" isn't really relevant. This also brings it in line with
> what a msvc produced dll will have (an image base of 0x1000).
>
> Signed-
From: Alex Smith
There's no reason for it. ASLR will rebase it regardless so "preventing
collisions" isn't really relevant. This also brings it in line with
what a msvc produced dll will have (an image base of 0x1000).
Signed-off-by: Alex Smith
---
configure | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 ins