Reimar Döffinger:
> On 03.06.2019, at 14:07, Andreas Rheinhardt
> wrote:
>
>> Reimar Döffinger:
>>> On 03.06.2019, at 00:37, Andreas Rheinhardt
>>> wrote:
>>>
Up until now, a temporary variable was used and initialized every time a
value was read in CBS; if reading turned out to be s
On 03.06.2019, at 14:07, Andreas Rheinhardt
wrote:
> Reimar Döffinger:
>> On 03.06.2019, at 00:37, Andreas Rheinhardt
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Up until now, a temporary variable was used and initialized every time a
>>> value was read in CBS; if reading turned out to be successfull, this
>>> value wa
Reimar Döffinger:
> On 03.06.2019, at 00:37, Andreas Rheinhardt
> wrote:
>
>> Up until now, a temporary variable was used and initialized every time a
>> value was read in CBS; if reading turned out to be successfull, this
>> value was overwritten (without having ever been looked at) with the
>>
On 03.06.2019, at 00:37, Andreas Rheinhardt
wrote:
> Up until now, a temporary variable was used and initialized every time a
> value was read in CBS; if reading turned out to be successfull, this
> value was overwritten (without having ever been looked at) with the
> value read if reading was s
Up until now, a temporary variable was used and initialized every time a
value was read in CBS; if reading turned out to be successfull, this
value was overwritten (without having ever been looked at) with the
value read if reading was successfull; on failure the variable wasn't
touched either. The
