On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:01:26PM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> The current one, while correct, does not yield the best possible
> results. The specificiations suggest another formula, which results
> in quality gains in the decoded output from fate tests. This
> justifies changing said formu
The current one, while correct, does not yield the best possible
results. The specificiations suggest another formula, which results
in quality gains in the decoded output from fate tests. This
justifies changing said formula.
---
libavcodec/dnxhddec.c | 3 ++-
tests/ref/vs
