> On Dec 25, 2021, at 3:08 AM, Derek Buitenhuis
> wrote:
>
> On 12/24/2021 10:46 AM, Steven Liu wrote:
>> I think about ignore hoov should not default, because it use hoov
>> default before.
>
> I agree - we (Vimeo) get a ton of hoov files with no moov or broken moov -
> much more than files
On 12/24/2021 10:46 AM, Steven Liu wrote:
> I think about ignore hoov should not default, because it use hoov
> default before.
I agree - we (Vimeo) get a ton of hoov files with no moov or broken moov -
much more than files with hoov and valid moov (I've never seen any). This
would be quite a brea
"zhilizhao(赵志立)" 于2021年12月24日周五 18:38写道:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 24, 2021, at 6:19 PM, Steven Liu wrote:
> >
> >> 2021年12月24日 下午5:58,Zhao Zhili 写道:
> >>
> >> The samples I have got have hoov and moov both. Unknown boxes
> >> should be skipped according to the spec. So don't treat hoov as
> >> moov in n
> On Dec 24, 2021, at 6:19 PM, Steven Liu wrote:
>
>> 2021年12月24日 下午5:58,Zhao Zhili 写道:
>>
>> The samples I have got have hoov and moov both. Unknown boxes
>> should be skipped according to the spec. So don't treat hoov as
>> moov in normal mode.
>>
>> For backward compatible, a log message
> 2021年12月24日 下午5:58,Zhao Zhili 写道:
>
> The samples I have got have hoov and moov both. Unknown boxes
> should be skipped according to the spec. So don't treat hoov as
> moov in normal mode.
>
> For backward compatible, a log message has been added to notice
> the user to relax the striction i
The samples I have got have hoov and moov both. Unknown boxes
should be skipped according to the spec. So don't treat hoov as
moov in normal mode.
For backward compatible, a log message has been added to notice
the user to relax the striction if moov doesn't exist.
Fix #8883.
---
libavformat/mov