Michael Niedermayer:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 09:00:24AM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>> Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-09-09 20:15:22)
>>> Michael Niedermayer:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer:
>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:38
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 09:00:24AM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-09-09 20:15:22)
> > Michael Niedermayer:
> > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> > >> Michael Niedermayer:
> > >>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:38:51PM +0200, Andreas
Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-09-09 20:15:22)
> Michael Niedermayer:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> >> Michael Niedermayer:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:38:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer:
> > [...]
> >>> To me if i
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 06:34:43PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer:
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 08:15:22PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> >> Michael Niedermayer:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer:
> >
Michael Niedermayer:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 08:15:22PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> Michael Niedermayer:
>>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Michael Niedermayer:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:38:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> Micha
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 08:15:22PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> >> Michael Niedermayer:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:38:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer:
> > [...
Michael Niedermayer:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> Michael Niedermayer:
>>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:38:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Michael Niedermayer:
> [...]
>>> To me if i look at the evolution
>>> of isBE() / code checking BE-ness it
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:38:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> >> Michael Niedermayer:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:38:11AM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Up until now,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:38:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> >> Michael Niedermayer:
[...]
> > To me if i look at the evolution
> > of isBE() / code checking BE-ness it become more messy over tim
Michael Niedermayer:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:38:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> Michael Niedermayer:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:38:11AM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Up until now, libswscale/input.c used a macro to read
an input pixel which involved a call
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:38:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:38:11AM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> >> Up until now, libswscale/input.c used a macro to read
> >> an input pixel which involved a call to av_pix_fmt_desc_get(
Michael Niedermayer:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:38:11AM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> Up until now, libswscale/input.c used a macro to read
>> an input pixel which involved a call to av_pix_fmt_desc_get()
>> to find out whether the input pixel format is BE or LE
>> despite this bein
Hi
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:38:11AM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Up until now, libswscale/input.c used a macro to read
> an input pixel which involved a call to av_pix_fmt_desc_get()
> to find out whether the input pixel format is BE or LE
> despite this being known at compile-time (there
Up until now, libswscale/input.c used a macro to read
an input pixel which involved a call to av_pix_fmt_desc_get()
to find out whether the input pixel format is BE or LE
despite this being known at compile-time (there are templates
per pixfmt). Even worse, these calls are made in a loop,
so that e
14 matches
Mail list logo