On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 12:07:43 +0200
Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:30:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> >* PSEUDOPAL pixel formats are not paletted, but carried a palette with the
> *>* intention of allowing code to treat unpaletted formats as paletted. The
> *>* palette simply mapped
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:30:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
>* PSEUDOPAL pixel formats are not paletted, but carried a palette with the
*>* intention of allowing code to treat unpaletted formats as paletted. The
*>* palette simply mapped the byte values to the resulting RGB values,
*>* making it some sort
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:30:43 +0200
wm4 wrote:
> PSEUDOPAL pixel formats are not paletted, but carried a palette with the
If nobody has any comments, I will push tonight or tomorrow or so.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffm
On 3/30/2018 9:55 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 01:55:52 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 01:31:35PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Why you and some other 'old' developers have urge to block every single
>>> patch
>>> that comes from some developers
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 01:55:52 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 01:31:35PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> [...]
> > Why you and some other 'old' developers have urge to block every single
> > patch
> > that comes from some developers?
>
> Thats a pretty serious accusatio
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 01:31:35PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
[...]
> Why you and some other 'old' developers have urge to block every single patch
> that comes from some developers?
Thats a pretty serious accusation, you should not throw this around
lightly unless its true.
Also i would generall
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:22:25 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 03:23:25AM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 03:13:07 +0200
> > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:30:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> > > > PSEUDOPAL pixel formats are not p
On 3/30/18, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 03:23:25AM +0200, wm4 wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 03:13:07 +0200
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:30:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
>> > > PSEUDOPAL pixel formats are not paletted, but carried a palette wit
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 03:23:25AM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 03:13:07 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:30:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> > > PSEUDOPAL pixel formats are not paletted, but carried a palette with the
> > > intention of allowing code to trea
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 03:13:07 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:30:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> > PSEUDOPAL pixel formats are not paletted, but carried a palette with the
> > intention of allowing code to treat unpaletted formats as paletted. The
> > palette simply mapped t
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:30:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> PSEUDOPAL pixel formats are not paletted, but carried a palette with the
> intention of allowing code to treat unpaletted formats as paletted. The
> palette simply mapped the byte values to the resulting RGB values,
> making it some sort of LUT
PSEUDOPAL pixel formats are not paletted, but carried a palette with the
intention of allowing code to treat unpaletted formats as paletted. The
palette simply mapped the byte values to the resulting RGB values,
making it some sort of LUT for RGB conversion.
It was used for 1 byte formats only: RG
12 matches
Mail list logo
