Hi
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 07:41:39PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi Kacper
>
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 12:45:14PM +0100, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
> [...]
> > security benefits. I get it. Someone needed to hit their KPI by
> > submitting CVEs, and they found a marginally applicable case of
Hi Kacper
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 12:45:14PM +0100, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
[...]
> security benefits. I get it. Someone needed to hit their KPI by
> submitting CVEs, and they found a marginally applicable case of a
> highly unrealistic attack scenario.
I think you mis judge the (un)realism of th
Hi Traneptora
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 06:35:07PM -0500, Leo Izen wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/25 4:44 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:12:30PM +0200, Jan Ekström wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 4:24 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe
On 1/28/25 4:44 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:12:30PM +0200, Jan Ekström wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 4:24 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
Maybe fixes: 11435
Do I understand correctly that the root issue that's being attempted
to be fixed by the initial pa
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 at 22:44, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:12:30PM +0200, Jan Ekström wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 4:24 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe fixes: 11435
> > >
> >
> > Do I understand correctly that the root issue that's bei
Hi
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:12:30PM +0200, Jan Ekström wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 4:24 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe fixes: 11435
> >
>
> Do I understand correctly that the root issue that's being attempted
> to be fixed by the initial patch set is that unusual demuxers w
Hi
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:12:30PM +0200, Jan Ekström wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 4:24 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe fixes: 11435
> >
>
> Do I understand correctly that the root issue that's being attempted
> to be fixed by the initial patch set is that unusual demuxers w
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 4:24 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> Maybe fixes: 11435
>
Do I understand correctly that the root issue that's being attempted
to be fixed by the initial patch set is that unusual demuxers were
possible to have been probed and opened through the HLS meta demuxer?
In that
Maybe fixes: 11435
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer
---
libavformat/hls.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavformat/hls.c b/libavformat/hls.c
index d2787ade46b..bdc3f5dbed5 100644
--- a/libavformat/hls.c
+++ b/libavformat/hls.c
@@ -754,6 +754,10 @@ static int test_seg
