Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2022-01-13 11:50:48)
>
> My objections to adding a separately allocated muxing context and to
> this MuxStream have not changed. Both incur unnecessary allocations
> and indirections and (in case of the latter) loops;
I cannot imagine any remotely real situation where
Anton Khirnov:
> The muxing queue currently lives in OutputStream, which is a very large
> struct storing the state for both encoding and muxing. The muxing queue
> is only used by the code in ffmpeg_mux, so it makes sense to restrict it
> to that file.
>
> This makes the first step towards reduci
The muxing queue currently lives in OutputStream, which is a very large
struct storing the state for both encoding and muxing. The muxing queue
is only used by the code in ffmpeg_mux, so it makes sense to restrict it
to that file.
This makes the first step towards reducing the scope of OutputStrea
