On 5/16/2019 7:30 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Up until now, the SimpleBlock was treated specially: It basically had
> its own EBML category and it was also included in the BlockGroup EBML
> syntax (although a SimpleBlock must not exist in a BlockGroup according
> to the Matroska specifications)
Up until now, the SimpleBlock was treated specially: It basically had
its own EBML category and it was also included in the BlockGroup EBML
syntax (although a SimpleBlock must not exist in a BlockGroup according
to the Matroska specifications). The latter fact also meant that
a MatroskaBlock's buff
