Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/5] lavfi/buffersink: loop over ff_request_frame().

2015-09-20 Thread Nicolas George
Le jour de la Vertu, an CCXXIII, Nicolas George a écrit : > I believe it is, but I am still in the rush after the end of vacations. I > expect to have contiguous time to re-test and push it during next week. Patch series pushed. Thanks for the reviews. Regards, -- Nicolas George signature.a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/5] lavfi/buffersink: loop over ff_request_frame().

2015-09-17 Thread Nicolas George
Le jour de la Vertu, an CCXXIII, Paul B Mahol a écrit : > So, is this patchset ready for pushing or there is something > else that needs to be done? I believe it is, but I am still in the rush after the end of vacations. I expect to have contiguous time to re-test and push it during next week. Re

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/5] lavfi/buffersink: loop over ff_request_frame().

2015-09-17 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 8/26/15, Nicolas George wrote: > Do not assume that ff_request_frame() returning success > implies a frame has arrived in the FIFO. > Instead, just loop until a frame is in the FIFO. > It does not change anything since the same loop is present > in ff_request_frame(), confirmed by an assertion.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/5] lavfi/buffersink: loop over ff_request_frame().

2015-08-28 Thread Paul B Mahol
Dana 26. 8. 2015. 13:19 osoba "Nicolas George" napisala je: > > Do not assume that ff_request_frame() returning success > implies a frame has arrived in the FIFO. > Instead, just loop until a frame is in the FIFO. > It does not change anything since the same loop is present > in ff_request_frame()

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/5] lavfi/buffersink: loop over ff_request_frame().

2015-08-26 Thread Nicolas George
Do not assume that ff_request_frame() returning success implies a frame has arrived in the FIFO. Instead, just loop until a frame is in the FIFO. It does not change anything since the same loop is present in ff_request_frame(), confirmed by an assertion. Signed-off-by: Nicolas George --- libavfi