James Almer:
> On 3/11/2021 5:08 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> James Almer:
>>> On 3/11/2021 3:26 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
> On 3/11/2021 2:48 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> James Almer:
>>> On 3/11/2021 2:27 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer
James Almer:
> On 3/14/2021 7:34 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>> Quoting James Almer (2021-03-12 18:24:47)
>>>
>>> The padding exists AFAIK because something, like an optimized bitstream
>>> reader that tries to process several bytes at the same time, may end up
>>> reading or writing pass the reported
Michael Niedermayer:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 04:51:44PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>> Quoting James Almer (2021-03-14 16:35:48)
>>> On 3/14/2021 7:34 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting James Almer (2021-03-12 18:24:47)
>
> The padding exists AFAIK because something, like an optimized
Marton Balint:
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
>
I get a packet from a demuxer. It contains two independent portions
(NALUs, OBUs, etc) i want to separate in order to feed them to
something like a multi threaded decoder. And so I create a new
reference to i
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 04:51:44PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting James Almer (2021-03-14 16:35:48)
> > On 3/14/2021 7:34 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > > Quoting James Almer (2021-03-12 18:24:47)
> > >>
> > >> The padding exists AFAIK because something, like an optimized bitstream
> > >> read
On 3/14/2021 7:34 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting James Almer (2021-03-12 18:24:47)
The padding exists AFAIK because something, like an optimized bitstream
reader that tries to process several bytes at the same time, may end up
reading or writing pass the reported end of the buffer.
That means
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
I get a packet from a demuxer. It contains two independent portions
(NALUs, OBUs, etc) i want to separate in order to feed them to
something like a multi threaded decoder. And so I create a new
reference to it, resulting in two packets pointing to th
On 3/12/2021 2:09 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
On 3/11/2021 7:40 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
This function acts as a replacemen
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
On 3/11/2021 7:40 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
This function acts as a replacement for both av_grow_packet() and
av_shrink_pa
On 3/11/2021 7:40 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
This function acts as a replacement for both av_grow_packet() and
av_shrink_packet(), the latter which is now deprecated a
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
This function acts as a replacement for both av_grow_packet() and
av_shrink_packet(), the latter which is now deprecated and will be
removed as
it does not correctl
On 3/11/2021 5:08 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 3:26 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 2:48 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 2:27 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 1:56 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote
James Almer:
> On 3/11/2021 3:26 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> James Almer:
>>> On 3/11/2021 2:48 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
> On 3/11/2021 2:27 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> James Almer:
>>> On 3/11/2021 1:56 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer
On 3/11/2021 3:26 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 2:48 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 2:27 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 1:56 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
James Almer:
> On 3/11/2021 2:48 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> James Almer:
>>> On 3/11/2021 2:27 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
> On 3/11/2021 1:56 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> James Almer:
>>> On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>>>
On 3/11/2021 2:48 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 2:27 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 1:56 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
This function acts as
James Almer:
> On 3/11/2021 2:27 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> James Almer:
>>> On 3/11/2021 1:56 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
> On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
>>
>>> This function acts as a r
On 3/11/2021 2:27 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 1:56 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
This function acts as a replacement for both av_grow_packet() and
av_shrink_packet()
James Almer:
> On 3/11/2021 1:56 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> James Almer:
>>> On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
> This function acts as a replacement for both av_grow_packet() and
> av_shrink_packet(), the latter whic
On 3/11/2021 1:56 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
This function acts as a replacement for both av_grow_packet() and
av_shrink_packet(), the latter which is now deprecated and will be
removed as
it
James Almer:
> On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
>>
>>> This function acts as a replacement for both av_grow_packet() and
>>> av_shrink_packet(), the latter which is now deprecated and will be
>>> removed as
>>> it does not correctly handle
On 3/11/2021 1:11 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
This function acts as a replacement for both av_grow_packet() and
av_shrink_packet(), the latter which is now deprecated and will be
removed as
it does not correctly handle non-writable packets.
I don't thi
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, James Almer wrote:
This function acts as a replacement for both av_grow_packet() and
av_shrink_packet(), the latter which is now deprecated and will be removed as
it does not correctly handle non-writable packets.
I don't think this is a good idea, av_shrink_packet canno
This function acts as a replacement for both av_grow_packet() and
av_shrink_packet(), the latter which is now deprecated and will be removed as
it does not correctly handle non-writable packets.
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
libavcodec/avpacket.c | 19 +++
libavcodec/packet.h
24 matches
Mail list logo
