On 8/25/2016 5:49 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> However, removing the part about the sample being missing in
> the commit message would be wrong, because it is, in fact, not
> linked in the commit message.
I must step out now, so please push whenever some consensus is
reached. No point in bikeshed
On 8/25/2016 5:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> ok if i push with the changes requested in:
> https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2016-August/198303.html
> ? (seems another reply with forgotten CC)
You can change 'hack' to 'incorrect workaround' if you wish.
However, removing the p
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:58:14PM +0100, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> This breaks files with legitimate single-entry edit lists,
> and the hack, introduced in f03a081df09f9c4798a17d7e24446ed47924b11b,
> has no link to any known sample in its commit message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis
> ---
This breaks files with legitimate single-entry edit lists,
and the hack, introduced in f03a081df09f9c4798a17d7e24446ed47924b11b,
has no link to any known sample in its commit message.
Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis
---
libavformat/isom.h | 1 -
libavformat/mov.c | 8 +---
2 files changed,
