On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 08:14:24PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le decadi 30 thermidor, an CCXXII, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> > michaelni: oh, rly? well I know the code..
> > michaelni: I can look, weblink to patches?
> > michaelni: oh, those, both ok
>
> If it means what I believe it me
Le decadi 30 thermidor, an CCXXII, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> michaelni: oh, rly? well I know the code..
> michaelni: I can look, weblink to patches?
> michaelni: oh, those, both ok
If it means what I believe it means, then: Thanks, pushed to my tree for
merge.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Geo
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 02:26:29PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> The current code would use any unknown attribute-value pair
> as the cookie value.
> RFC 6265 states that the first key-value pair is the actual
> cookie, and the attribute-value pairs only start after.
>
> With the current code:
>
The current code would use any unknown attribute-value pair
as the cookie value.
RFC 6265 states that the first key-value pair is the actual
cookie, and the attribute-value pairs only start after.
With the current code:
Set-Cookie: test=good_value; path=/; dummy=42
gives this:
Cookie: dummy=42
ins
