On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 11/14/15, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> It is known that the naive sqrt(x*x + y*y) approach for computing the
>> hypotenuse suffers from overflow and accuracy issues, see e.g
>> http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/06/02/whats-so-hard-about-f
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 11/14/15, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> It is known that the naive sqrt(x*x + y*y) approach for computing the
>> hypotenuse suffers from overflow and accuracy issues, see e.g
>> http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/06/02/whats-so-hard-about-f
On 11/14/15, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> It is known that the naive sqrt(x*x + y*y) approach for computing the
> hypotenuse suffers from overflow and accuracy issues, see e.g
> http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/06/02/whats-so-hard-about-finding-a-hypotenuse/.
> This adds hypot support to FFmpeg,
It is known that the naive sqrt(x*x + y*y) approach for computing the
hypotenuse suffers from overflow and accuracy issues, see e.g
http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/06/02/whats-so-hard-about-finding-a-hypotenuse/.
This adds hypot support to FFmpeg, a C99 function.
On platforms without hypot, thi
