On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Just push it, I'm not sure I can come up with an airtight mechanism that is
> not mega-overdesigned into oblivion...
Applied, thanks,
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Henrik Gramner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Henrik Gramner wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> >> Does this mean these macros are defined and 1 when AVCODEC=0?
> >>
> >> That seems like a bug?
> >
> > Yes, they
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Henrik Gramner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Does this mean these macros are defined and 1 when AVCODEC=0?
>>
>> That seems like a bug?
>
> Yes, they are., but I have no idea what the intended behavior of the
> CONFIG_* variabl
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Does this mean these macros are defined and 1 when AVCODEC=0?
>
> That seems like a bug?
Yes, they are., but I have no idea what the intended behavior of the
CONFIG_* variables are.
___
ffmpeg-d
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Henrik Gramner wrote:
> ---
> tests/checkasm/checkasm.c | 42 ++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/checkasm/checkasm.c b/tests/checkasm/checkasm.c
> index d7c2e8a..264473a 100644
---
tests/checkasm/checkasm.c | 42 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/checkasm/checkasm.c b/tests/checkasm/checkasm.c
index d7c2e8a..264473a 100644
--- a/tests/checkasm/checkasm.c
+++ b/tests/checkasm/checkasm.c
@@ -57,
