On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:25:30 +0200
wm4 wrote:
> Assuming the first and second packets are partial, this would append the
> reassembly buffer (ctx->buf) to itself with the second
> append_to_cached_buf() call, because buf is set to ctx->buf.
>
> I do not know a valid sample file which triggers th
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:15:23 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 06:25:30PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> > Assuming the first and second packets are partial, this would append the
> > reassembly buffer (ctx->buf) to itself with the second
> > append_to_cached_buf() call, because buf
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 06:25:30PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> Assuming the first and second packets are partial, this would append the
> reassembly buffer (ctx->buf) to itself with the second
> append_to_cached_buf() call, because buf is set to ctx->buf.
>
> I do not know a valid sample file which trigge
Assuming the first and second packets are partial, this would append the
reassembly buffer (ctx->buf) to itself with the second
append_to_cached_buf() call, because buf is set to ctx->buf.
I do not know a valid sample file which triggers this, and do not know
if packets can be split into more than
