On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 08:01:37AM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:45:27PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> >> lrint is faster and co
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 08:01:37AM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:45:27PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> lrint is faster and conveys the intent better here. It is safe as long int
> >> has
> >>
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:45:27PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> lrint is faster and conveys the intent better here. It is safe as long int
>> has
>> at least 32 bits.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> ---
>> libavfilt
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:45:27PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> lrint is faster and conveys the intent better here. It is safe as long int has
> at least 32 bits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> ---
> libavfilter/vf_idet.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
ha
lrint is faster and conveys the intent better here. It is safe as long int has
at least 32 bits.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
---
libavfilter/vf_idet.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_idet.c b/libavfilter/vf_idet.c
index e4fe6cb..60ec23a 10
