On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 02:04:36PM +0200, Mickaël Raulet wrote:
> for the whole patchset.
all applied
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Let us carefully observe those good qualities wherein our enemies excel us
and endeavor to excel them, by a
for the whole patchset.
Mickaël
Le 22 août 2014 à 13:25, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:40:17AM +0200, Mickaël Raulet wrote:
>> Patch okay.
>
> patch applied
>
> just to make sure i dont misunderstand, that "okay" was just for this
> patch or the whole patchset ?
>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:40:17AM +0200, Mickaël Raulet wrote:
> Patch okay.
patch applied
just to make sure i dont misunderstand, that "okay" was just for this
patch or the whole patchset ?
thanks
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
In fact, the
Patch okay.
Mickaël
Le 4 août 2014 à 10:31, Christophe Gisquet a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> 2014-08-02 14:48 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer :
>> seems to fail with
>> libavcodec/x86/hevc_mc.asm:1258: error: (add:2) cannot reference symbol
>> `MAX_PB_SIZE' in preprocessor
>
> I forgot the initial patch
Hi,
2014-08-04 15:20 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> cc-ing Mickael, so its not missed
Ping.
The objection was mostly that openhevc was working on some arm
optimization. That should be pretty easy even for Mickael, considering
this code:
https://github.com/OpenHEVC/FFmpeg/blob/rext/libavcodec/
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 07:10:13PM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2014-08-02 14:48 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> > is this for apply/push or just RFC/WIP ?
>
> in-between. I had expected Mickael Raulet to comment if he was seeing
> something not compatible with this. I think the b
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 10:31:52AM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2014-08-02 14:48 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> > seems to fail with
> > libavcodec/x86/hevc_mc.asm:1258: error: (add:2) cannot reference symbol
> > `MAX_PB_SIZE' in preprocessor
>
> I forgot the initial patch when
Hi,
2014-08-02 14:48 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> seems to fail with
> libavcodec/x86/hevc_mc.asm:1258: error: (add:2) cannot reference symbol
> `MAX_PB_SIZE' in preprocessor
I forgot the initial patch when generating the patchset, that you can
find here. I expect no changes for the others,
Hi,
2014-08-02 14:48 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> is this for apply/push or just RFC/WIP ?
in-between. I had expected Mickael Raulet to comment if he was seeing
something not compatible with this. I think the bipred code is a bit
more mature since Ronald comments (iirc), so premature optimiz
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 05:17:24PM +, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> MAX_PB_SIZE is used or assumed for various buffer strides. In some cases,
> it is used as constant parameter(s) to functions.
>
> Make use of that knowledge to:
> - not pass the parameter
> - avoid extra GPR usage
> - precompute
MAX_PB_SIZE is used or assumed for various buffer strides. In some cases,
it is used as constant parameter(s) to functions.
Make use of that knowledge to:
- not pass the parameter
- avoid extra GPR usage
- precompute addresses / offsets
Premature optimization and overall not that useful.
Before:
11 matches
Mail list logo