Hi,
2014-10-04 1:19 GMT+02:00 James Almer :
> Or how everything is declared as sse4 even though less than half the code
> actually uses sse4 instructions.
The incorrect insn patch actually caught another issue in qpel_hv
(where packusdw is required) , which made me the macros mess even more
messi
On 03/10/14 6:47 PM, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2014-10-03 19:36 GMT+02:00 James Almer :
>> When i first tried to tackle the libswresample asm to reduce the overall
>> object size, the general reaction was that speed is more important than
>> size.
>
> Wasn't the trade-off much worse the
Hi,
2014-10-03 19:36 GMT+02:00 James Almer :
> When i first tried to tackle the libswresample asm to reduce the overall
> object size, the general reaction was that speed is more important than
> size.
Wasn't the trade-off much worse there? (the impact here is around 1%)
> Adding AVX2 MC functio
On 02/10/14 3:52 PM, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Preamble: I don't see an easy way out of the issue, and this patchset
> has several drawbacks, so I don't mind if it is not applied.
>
> The dsp init instanciates most widths and thus unrolls the calls. As a
> consequence, the object size balloons q
Preamble: I don't see an easy way out of the issue, and this patchset
has several drawbacks, so I don't mind if it is not applied.
The dsp init instanciates most widths and thus unrolls the calls. As a
consequence, the object size balloons quite quickly:
x86/hevc_mc.o: 115920
x86/hevcdsp_init
