On 2017-02-02 00:15, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
2017-02-01 23:54 GMT+01:00 Philip Langdale :
We have been pretending that the nvenc YUV444P10 format is our
YUV444P16 format, and this is not a good idea. It leads to us
failing to dither >10bit content when transcoding
Could you provide samples for
2017-02-01 23:54 GMT+01:00 Philip Langdale :
> We have been pretending that the nvenc YUV444P10 format is our
> YUV444P16 format, and this is not a good idea. It leads to us
> failing to dither >10bit content when transcoding
Could you provide samples for me (or explain how I can
reproduce this) t
We have been pretending that the nvenc YUV444P10 format is our
YUV444P16 format, and this is not a good idea. It leads to us
failing to dither >10bit content when transcoding and also
results in encoded files with 4:4:4 sampling which are almost
certainly not what the user wants.
Philip Langdale (
