On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, N
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
>
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Nov
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> - I think the
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>>
>> - I think the name of this function is confusing. The av_clip* namespace
>> > seems reserved for int
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
>
> - I think the name of this function is confusing. The av_clip* namespace
> > seems reserved for int to int clips, so using it for a float to int
> > conversion with clip
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:59:08PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 06:51:19PM -0500, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Nov
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 06:51:19PM -0500, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:2
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 06:51:19PM -0500, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> >> > Le primidi 11 brumaire, an CCXX
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 06:51:19PM -0500, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
>> > Le primidi 11 brumaire, an CCXXIV, Ronald S. Bultje a écrit :
>> >> So, is this a bug in llrint, or is thi
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 06:51:19PM -0500, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Le primidi 11 brumaire, an CCXXIV, Ronald S. Bultje a écrit :
> >> So, is this a bug in llrint, or is this a failure to use llrint, or is this
> >> different from llrint?
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 11 brumaire, an CCXXIV, Ronald S. Bultje a écrit :
>> So, is this a bug in llrint, or is this a failure to use llrint, or is this
>> different from llrint? It sounds to me that llrint should be used, not our
>> own alternative.
>
>
Le primidi 11 brumaire, an CCXXIV, Ronald S. Bultje a écrit :
> So, is this a bug in llrint, or is this a failure to use llrint, or is this
> different from llrint? It sounds to me that llrint should be used, not our
> own alternative.
Is there a sized version of the function? int64rint? Otherwise
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Float
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <
> gajjanaga...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Floating point to integer conversion is well defined when
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> Floating point to integer conversion is well defined when the float lies
>> within
>> the representation bounds of the integer after discarding the fractional
>> par
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> Floating point to integer conversion is well defined when the float lies
> within
> the representation bounds of the integer after discarding the fractional
> part.
> However, in other cases, unfortunately the standard leaves it und
Floating point to integer conversion is well defined when the float lies within
the representation bounds of the integer after discarding the fractional part.
However, in other cases, unfortunately the standard leaves it undefined.
In particular, assuming that it saturates in a sane way is a danger
18 matches
Mail list logo