36
>>>> À : FFmpeg development discussions and patches
>>>> Objet : Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] avcodec/dolby_e: Add a parser
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Changes looks trivial enough.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If no on
On 1/25/2021 12:35 PM, Lynne wrote:
Jan 25, 2021, 12:03 by nicolas.gaullier@cji.paris:
De : ffmpeg-devel De la part de Paul B Mahol
Envoyé : jeudi 21 janvier 2021 13:36
À : FFmpeg development discussions and patches
Objet : Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] avcodec/dolby_e: Add a parser
Jan 25, 2021, 12:03 by nicolas.gaullier@cji.paris:
> >De : ffmpeg-devel De la part de Paul B
> >Mahol
> >Envoyé : jeudi 21 janvier 2021 13:36
> >À : FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> >Objet : Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] avcodec/dolby_e: Add a p
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:04 PM Nicolas Gaullier
wrote:
> >De : ffmpeg-devel De la part de Paul B
> Mahol
> >Envoyé : jeudi 21 janvier 2021 13:36
> >À : FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> >Objet : Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] avcodec/dolby_e: Add a
>De : ffmpeg-devel De la part de Paul B Mahol
>Envoyé : jeudi 21 janvier 2021 13:36
>À : FFmpeg development discussions and patches
>Objet : Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] avcodec/dolby_e: Add a parser
>
>Changes looks trivial enough.
If no one object, the two patches may be a
Changes looks trivial enough.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:30 PM Nicolas Gaullier
wrote:
> >De : Nicolas Gaullier
> >Envoyé : jeudi 14 janvier 2021 17:26
> >À : ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> >Cc : Nicolas Gaullier
> >Objet : [PATCH 0/2] avcodec/dolby_e: Add a parser
> >
> >I have limited duplicated c
>De : Nicolas Gaullier
>Envoyé : jeudi 14 janvier 2021 17:26
>À : ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>Cc : Nicolas Gaullier
>Objet : [PATCH 0/2] avcodec/dolby_e: Add a parser
>
>I have limited duplicated code by making the decoder calling the parser.
>An option would be to leave all common code to dolby_e.
I have limited duplicated code by making the decoder calling the parser.
An option would be to leave all common code to dolby_e.c and move decoding to
dolby_edec.c,
but that would require either to duplicate 3 "very-internal" functions
(skip_input/parse_key/convert_input) 3x times instead of twic
