Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Update vf_bwdif to use yadif_common v2

2018-11-14 Thread Philip Langdale
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 02:11:15 +0100 Thomas Mundt wrote: > Am So., 11. Nov. 2018 um 20:47 Uhr schrieb Philip Langdale < > phil...@overt.org>: > > > vf_bwdif's frame management logic is almost identical to that of > > yadif. The only difference is that it tracks the first and last > > fields in a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Update vf_bwdif to use yadif_common v2

2018-11-12 Thread Thomas Mundt
Am So., 11. Nov. 2018 um 20:47 Uhr schrieb Philip Langdale < phil...@overt.org>: > vf_bwdif's frame management logic is almost identical to that of yadif. > The only difference is that it tracks the first and last fields in a > sequence, and that requires slight changes to the common code. > > Ass

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Update vf_bwdif to use yadif_common v2

2018-11-11 Thread Philip Langdale
vf_bwdif's frame management logic is almost identical to that of yadif. The only difference is that it tracks the first and last fields in a sequence, and that requires slight changes to the common code. Assuming it's reasonable to do that tracking even though yadif doesn't need it, we can then re

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Update vf_bwdif to use yadif_common

2018-11-10 Thread Philip Langdale
vf_bwdif's frame management logic is almost identical to that of yadif. The only difference is that it tracks the first and last fields in a sequence, and that requires slight changes to the common code. Assuming it's reasonable to do that tracking even though yadif doesn't need it, we can then re