Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Tile threading support for vp9

2017-08-28 Thread gh0st
Fixed in PATCHv3 On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:22:15AM +0700, Ilia Valiakhmetov wrote: > > These patches introduce tile threading support for vp9. > > > > Tile threading is ~45% faster at 2 threads vs 1. > > Frame threading is ~55% faste

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Tile threading support for vp9

2017-08-27 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:22:15AM +0700, Ilia Valiakhmetov wrote: > These patches introduce tile threading support for vp9. > > Tile threading is ~45% faster at 2 threads vs 1. > Frame threading is ~55% faster at 2 threads vs 1. > ffvp9 tile threading is ~25% faster than libvpx-vp9 at 2 threads >

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Tile threading support for vp9

2017-08-27 Thread Ilia Valiakhmetov
These patches introduce tile threading support for vp9. Tile threading is ~45% faster at 2 threads vs 1. Frame threading is ~55% faster at 2 threads vs 1. ffvp9 tile threading is ~25% faster than libvpx-vp9 at 2 threads execute3() function is similar to execute2(), execept it has a extra argument