On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:32:57PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> __sync built-ins are considered legacy and will be deprecated.
> These new memory model aware built-ins have been available since GCC 4.7.0
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.0/gcc/_005f_005f
On 26/10/14 5:34 AM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On 26.10.2014, at 02:32, James Almer wrote:
>> __sync built-ins are considered legacy and will be deprecated.
>> These new memory model aware built-ins have been available since GCC 4.7.0
>
> To me this sounds like "except for tsan, these new functio
On 26.10.2014, at 02:32, James Almer wrote:
> __sync built-ins are considered legacy and will be deprecated.
> These new memory model aware built-ins have been available since GCC 4.7.0
To me this sounds like "except for tsan, these new functions are worse in every
aspect, and that's with gcc 4.
__sync built-ins are considered legacy and will be deprecated.
These new memory model aware built-ins have been available since GCC 4.7.0
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.0/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html
This is an RFC for a couple reasons.
The first is t