On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 08:21:07AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 07:57:29AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> > > > >
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 07:57:29AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:21:48PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > > > On
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 07:57:29AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:21:48PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > > On 6/29/2016 9:27 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > > > Ronald S. Bultje gmail.com> wr
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:21:48PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > On 6/29/2016 9:27 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > > Ronald S. Bultje gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > >> For the record: there was some discussion related to this on IR
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:21:48PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 6/29/2016 9:27 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Ronald S. Bultje gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> For the record: there was some discussion related to this on IRC.
> >
> > Would you mind adding some relevant points here?
> > I was under
On 6/29/2016 9:27 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Ronald S. Bultje gmail.com> writes:
>
>> For the record: there was some discussion related to this on IRC.
>
> Would you mind adding some relevant points here?
> I was under the impression that this mailing list
> is the main place for FFmpeg patc
Ronald S. Bultje gmail.com> writes:
> For the record: there was some discussion related to this on IRC.
Would you mind adding some relevant points here?
I was under the impression that this mailing list
is the main place for FFmpeg patch discussions, no?
Carl Eugen
___
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer niedermayer.cc> writes:
>
> > -We strongly recommend users, distributors, and system integrators to
> > -upgrade unless they use current git master.
>
> This makes sense imo.
>
> Thank you for trying to f
Michael Niedermayer niedermayer.cc> writes:
> -We strongly recommend users, distributors, and system integrators to
> -upgrade unless they use current git master.
This makes sense imo.
Thank you for trying to fix the issues, Carl Eugen
___
ff
The 3.1 release has some minor ABI incompatibilities compared to 3.0
The fixes of moving struct members or adding getters are disliked
bumping major soname also is disliked by the community
In case a consensus is found about how to deal with the issue, the
recommandition can be put back
---
src/i
10 matches
Mail list logo
