On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:31 PM, James Zern wrote:
>>
>> this is undocumented in the vp9 bitstream and decoding specification
>> doc, but matches libvpx
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Zern
>> ---
>> libavcodec/vp9.c | 2 +-
>> 1 fi
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:31 PM, James Zern wrote:
> this is undocumented in the vp9 bitstream and decoding specification
> doc, but matches libvpx
>
> Signed-off-by: James Zern
> ---
> libavcodec/vp9.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/vp
this is undocumented in the vp9 bitstream and decoding specification
doc, but matches libvpx
Signed-off-by: James Zern
---
libavcodec/vp9.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vp9.c b/libavcodec/vp9.c
index 7d8aced8c8..94430db9a3 100644
--- a/libavcodec
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:31 PM, James Zern wrote:
> this is undocumented in the vp9 bitstream and decoding specification
> doc, but matches libvpx
>
this came up in comparing decode results of ffvp9 and libvpx with
source from a hardware encoder.
> Signed-off-by: James Zern
> ---
> libavcodec
this is undocumented in the vp9 bitstream and decoding specification
doc, but matches libvpx
Signed-off-by: James Zern
---
libavcodec/vp9.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vp9.c b/libavcodec/vp9.c
index 7d8aced8c8..94430db9a3 100644
--- a/libavcodec