Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] vp9: assign PTS to visible instead of invisible frames

2015-02-05 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:22:09PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, wm4 wrote: > > > All the webm/vp9 files I have seen so far can have packets that contain > > 1 invisible and 1 visible frame. The vp9 parser separates them. Since > > the invisible frame

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] vp9: assign PTS to visible instead of invisible frames

2015-02-05 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, wm4 wrote: > All the webm/vp9 files I have seen so far can have packets that contain > 1 invisible and 1 visible frame. The vp9 parser separates them. Since > the invisible frame is always (?) the first sub-packet, the new packet > is assigned the PTS of the

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] vp9: assign PTS to visible instead of invisible frames

2015-02-05 Thread wm4
All the webm/vp9 files I have seen so far can have packets that contain 1 invisible and 1 visible frame. The vp9 parser separates them. Since the invisible frame is always (?) the first sub-packet, the new packet is assigned the PTS of the original packet, while the packet containing the visible fr