On 8/30/15, wm4 wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:09:05 + (UTC)
> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>> wm4 googlemail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Change the default to blend with black, which
>> > gives generally expected results.
>>
>> Given that this introduces a speed regression, is
>> rarely needed and i
wm4 googlemail.com> writes:
> > And "black" may be sensible for prores, in all
> > other cases, it is either suboptimal or bad.
>
> Such as? Name all the counter examples you know. I'm curious.
I already told you:
laraShadow_dl.flv
> But side from that, blending with _any_ color is
> still m
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 8:22 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:09:05 + (UTC)
> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>> wm4 googlemail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Change the default to blend with black, which
>> > gives generally expected results.
>>
>> Given that this introduces a speed regression, is
>
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:09:05 + (UTC)
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> wm4 googlemail.com> writes:
>
> > Change the default to blend with black, which
> > gives generally expected results.
>
> Given that this introduces a speed regression, is
> rarely needed and it is immediately visible that
>
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:09:05 + (UTC)
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> wm4 googlemail.com> writes:
>
> > Change the default to blend with black, which
> > gives generally expected results.
>
> Given that this introduces a speed regression, is
> rarely needed and it is immediately visible that
>
wm4 googlemail.com> writes:
> Change the default to blend with black, which
> gives generally expected results.
Given that this introduces a speed regression, is
rarely needed and it is immediately visible that
the function is needed, I don't think this is a
sensible change.
Note that contr
The old default for alpha -> non-alpha conversion was discarding the
alpha channel without. This meant that parts of the image which were not
meant to be visible became visible. This was a problem for video which
actually contained and used alpha. It can affect PNGs with an alpha
channel as well -
