On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:46:22AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:56:31AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>> >> give high quality resampling
>>
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:46:22AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:56:31AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> >> give high quality resampling
> >> as good as with linear_interp=on
> >> as fast as without linear_i
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:56:31AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>> give high quality resampling
>> as good as with linear_interp=on
>> as fast as without linear_interp=on
>> tested visually with ffplay
>> ffplay -f lavfi "aevalsrc='sin(1
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:56:31AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> give high quality resampling
> as good as with linear_interp=on
> as fast as without linear_interp=on
> tested visually with ffplay
> ffplay -f lavfi "aevalsrc='sin(1*t*t)', aresample=osr=48000,
> showcqt=gamma=5"
> ffplay -f lavf
give high quality resampling
as good as with linear_interp=on
as fast as without linear_interp=on
tested visually with ffplay
ffplay -f lavfi "aevalsrc='sin(1*t*t)', aresample=osr=48000,
showcqt=gamma=5"
ffplay -f lavfi "aevalsrc='sin(1*t*t)',
aresample=osr=48000:linear_interp=on, showcqt=g